DFND.AS vs. NATO.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L).
DFND.AS and NATO.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFND.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. It was launched on Feb 1, 2024. NATO.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the EQM Future of Defence Index. It was launched on Jul 4, 2023. Both DFND.AS and NATO.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.29% |
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 2.08% | 54.83% | 17.74% |
Returns By Period
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NATO.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 33.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank
DFND.AS
NATO.L
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFND.AS | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.37 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND.AS and NATO.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFND.AS nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND.AS | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -21.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -10.13% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.44% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility
DFND.AS vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFND.AS | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.17% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 27.77% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 27.77% | — |