R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS
R1GR.AS (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) and COPM.AS (iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - R1GR.AS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index, while COPM.AS is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, R1GR.AS returned 25.33% vs 104.17% for COPM.AS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. R1GR.AS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for COPM.AS.
Performance
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1GR.AS achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than COPM.AS's 25.99% return.
R1GR.AS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPM.AS
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 25.99%
- 6M
- 36.60%
- 1Y
- 104.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 6.45% | 17.57% | 35.07% | 6.55% |
COPM.AS iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF | 25.99% | 82.17% | 0.45% | -4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1GR.AS and COPM.AS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS — Risk / Return Rank
R1GR.AS
COPM.AS
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) and iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| R1GR.AS | COPM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 4.09 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 14.72 | -9.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| R1GR.AS | COPM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.75 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1GR.AS drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum COPM.AS drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1GR.AS and COPM.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1GR.AS | COPM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.09% | -37.12% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -25.05% | +9.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -3.81% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -11.54% | +8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 6.98% | -2.14% |
Volatility
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) is 4.13%, while iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) has a volatility of 13.86%. This indicates that R1GR.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPM.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1GR.AS | COPM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 13.86% | -9.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 31.88% | -20.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 37.25% | -21.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 34.32% | -15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 34.32% | -15.42% |
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
R1GR.AS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than COPM.AS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
R1GR.AS vs. COPM.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither R1GR.AS nor COPM.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
R1GR.AS and COPM.AS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1GR.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1GR.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for COPM.AS.
R1GR.AS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while COPM.AS is Commodity Producers Equities. R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index, while COPM.AS tracks STOXX Global Copper Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1GR.AS and 0.55% for COPM.AS.
Find the right allocation for R1GR.AS and COPM.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer