PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) and iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUEA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COPM.AS is traded in USD, while EUEA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUEA.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPM.AS achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than EUEA.AS's 5.30% return.


COPM.AS

1D
-2.44%
1M
16.46%
YTD
27.79%
6M
38.45%
1Y
110.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EUEA.AS

1D
-1.13%
1M
5.13%
YTD
5.30%
6M
7.56%
1Y
17.92%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COPM.AS
iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF
27.79%82.17%0.45%4.71%
EUEA.AS
iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
5.30%38.05%4.59%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between COPM.AS and EUEA.AS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023

0.54

The correlation between COPM.AS and EUEA.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPM.AS
COPM.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EUEA.AS
EUEA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EUEA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUEA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUEA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EUEA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUEA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) and iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUEA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPM.ASEUEA.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

1.35

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

4.57

+10.98

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the EUEA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPM.AS and EUEA.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPM.ASEUEA.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

1.01

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.12

+1.01

Drawdowns

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPM.AS drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum EUEA.AS drawdown of -65.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPM.AS and EUEA.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPM.ASEUEA.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.12%

-65.70%

+28.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.05%

-13.11%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-2.09%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.55%

-27.38%

+15.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.98%

3.89%

+3.09%

Volatility

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUEA.AS) at 6.22%. This indicates that COPM.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUEA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPM.ASEUEA.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.68%

6.22%

+8.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.95%

14.54%

+17.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.22%

17.49%

+19.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.34%

20.58%

+13.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.34%

20.37%

+13.97%

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPM.AS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EUEA.AS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPM.AS vs. EUEA.AS - Dividend Comparison

COPM.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUEA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPM.AS
iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUEA.AS
iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
2.57%2.52%3.01%3.02%2.94%2.05%2.16%3.05%3.67%2.85%3.38%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPM.AS and EUEA.AS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUEA.AS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUEA.AS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for COPM.AS.

COPM.AS is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while EUEA.AS is Europe Equities. COPM.AS tracks STOXX Global Copper Miners Index, while EUEA.AS tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for COPM.AS and 0.10% for EUEA.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPM.AS and EUEA.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer