QYLG vs. GAL
QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and GAL (SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, while GAL is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by State Street. QYLG is passively managed, while GAL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QYLG returned 12.12%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for GAL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GAL.
Performance
QYLG vs. GAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLG achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than GAL's 7.11% return.
QYLG
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- —
GAL
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
QYLG vs. GAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 12.38% | 15.29% | 22.02% | 38.73% | -26.27% | 18.29% | 13.88% |
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 7.11% | 15.95% | 9.85% | 13.32% | -13.41% | 12.23% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLG and GAL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between QYLG and GAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLG vs. GAL — Risk / Return Rank
QYLG
GAL
QYLG vs. GAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLG | GAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.76 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.22 | 11.45 | +3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLG vs. GAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, which is greater than GAL's maximum drawdown of -28.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and GAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLG | GAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.98% | -28.31% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.42% | -6.27% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.75% | -9.12% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | -21.14% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -2.04% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -3.73% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.51% | +0.41% |
Volatility
QYLG vs. GAL - Volatility Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) at 3.74%. This indicates that QYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLG | GAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 3.74% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 7.70% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 9.33% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 10.52% | +7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 11.39% | +6.66% |
QYLG vs. GAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GAL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLG vs. GAL - Dividend Comparison
QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.69%, more than GAL's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 3.47% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 6.19% | 4.05% | 2.14% | 2.96% | 2.43% | 2.26% | 2.43% | 3.10% |
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 16.69% | 17.93% | 25.27% | 5.43% | 6.91% | 10.15% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLG and GAL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLG has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to GAL (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLG dropped -29.98% vs GAL's -28.31%.
On 5-year performance, QYLG leads with 12.12% vs 6.68% for GAL. On fees, GAL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QYLG has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLG.
QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.69%, compared with 3.17% for GAL.
QYLG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GAL is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLG and 0.35% for GAL.
QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QYLG and GAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer