QYLE vs. IWMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI).
QYLE and IWMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QYLE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 ESG BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 21, 2023. IWMI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024.
Performance
QYLE vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QYLE vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | -4.11% |
Returns By Period
QYLE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMI
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 26.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QYLE vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLE has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QYLE vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank
QYLE
IWMI
QYLE vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLE | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.72 | — |
Dividends
QYLE vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison
QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.42%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 14.42% | 14.05% | 8.78% |
Drawdowns
QYLE vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IWMI drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLE and IWMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLE | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -23.88% | +23.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.80% | +4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.44% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility
QYLE vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QYLE | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 19.09% | -19.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.28% | -18.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.28% | -18.28% |