QYLD vs. SPOT
QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while SPOT (Spotify Technology S.A.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QYLD returned 8.24%/yr vs 16.18%/yr for SPOT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QYLD vs. SPOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPOT's -13.36% return.
QYLD
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 22.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
SPOT
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- -13.36%
- 6M
- -12.09%
- 1Y
- -29.36%
- 3Y*
- 49.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD vs. SPOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.05% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -1.30% |
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | -13.36% | 29.80% | 138.08% | 138.01% | -66.27% | -25.62% | 110.40% | 31.76% | -23.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD and SPOT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2018 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QYLD and SPOT has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD vs. SPOT — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD
SPOT
QYLD vs. SPOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QYLD | SPOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 0.90 | +0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | -0.63 | +5.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.31 | -1.10 | +27.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLD | SPOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | -0.65 | +3.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.34 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.34 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
QYLD vs. SPOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum SPOT drawdown of -80.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and SPOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD | SPOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -80.51% | +55.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -46.80% | +41.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -46.80% | +27.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | -76.39% | +51.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -35.16% | +34.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -30.81% | +26.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 26.76% | -25.90% |
Volatility
QYLD vs. SPOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 2.86%, while Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD | SPOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 15.97% | -13.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 37.40% | -29.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.84% | 45.30% | -36.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 47.60% | -32.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 47.26% | -31.75% |
Dividends
QYLD vs. SPOT - Dividend Comparison
QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, while SPOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.55% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD and SPOT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPOT has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to QYLD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs SPOT's -80.51%.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QYLD and SPOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer