QYLD vs. NAPR
QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QYLD tracks the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2 while NAPR tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QYLD returned 8.43%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for NAPR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.
Performance
QYLD vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 10.64% return.
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
NAPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 19.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 32.02% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.64% | 6.56% | 13.29% | 30.60% | -12.13% | 9.09% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD and NAPR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between QYLD and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
QYLD vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QYLD
NAPR
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QYLD
NAPR
Communication Services
QYLD
NAPR
Consumer Cyclical
QYLD
NAPR
Consumer Defensive
QYLD
NAPR
Healthcare
QYLD
NAPR
Industrials
QYLD
NAPR
Utilities
QYLD
NAPR
Basic Materials
QYLD
NAPR
Energy
QYLD
NAPR
Financial Services
QYLD
NAPR
Real Estate
QYLD
NAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD
NAPR
QYLD vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QYLD | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | 4.92 | -2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 8.93 | -5.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 2.23 | -0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 15.61 | -10.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.36 | 88.84 | -60.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLD | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 4.92 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.92 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.07 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
QYLD vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than NAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and NAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -16.53% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -1.24% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -14.52% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | -16.53% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -2.28% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.22% | +0.63% |
Volatility
QYLD vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 1.09%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 1.09% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 2.82% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.58% | 3.89% | +4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 11.27% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 10.61% | +4.88% |
QYLD vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLD vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison
QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, while NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD and NAPR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to NAPR (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs NAPR's -16.53%.
On 5-year performance, NAPR leads with 10.27% vs 8.43% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAPR.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.
QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.79% for NAPR.
NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QYLD and NAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer