QYLD vs. JEPG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and JEPG.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while JEPG.L is a Global Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. QYLD is passively managed, while JEPG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, QYLD returned 23.70% vs 0.74% for JEPG.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPG.L.

Performance

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than JEPG.L's -2.64% return.

QYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

JEPG.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: -2.64%
• 6M: -2.05%
• 1Y: 0.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	9.28%	19.35%	2.85%
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist	-2.64%	12.39%	7.83%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and JEPG.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023	0.13

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLD	JEPG.L
Technology	53.8%	21.1%
Communication Services	15.8%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	10.2%
Healthcare	4.2%	13.4%
Industrials	2.8%	6.7%
Utilities	1.4%	8.3%
Basic Materials	1.1%	4.7%
Energy	0.6%	1.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	13.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	2.2%

Return for Risk

QYLD vs. JEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

JEPG.L

JEPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 10
JEPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
JEPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
JEPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
JEPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
JEPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QYLD	JEPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	0.08	+2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	0.18	+3.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.02	+0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	0.09	+4.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.10	0.23	+27.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the JEPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and JEPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QYLD	JEPG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	0.08	+2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.69	-0.10

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than JEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and JEPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLD	JEPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-8.41%	-16.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.97%	-8.41%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-7.98%	+7.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-1.70%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	3.20%	-2.35%

Volatility

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 1.84%, while JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLD	JEPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	2.69%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.12%	6.64%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.57%	9.19%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.70%	10.97%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.49%	10.97%	+4.52%

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLD vs. JEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, more than JEPG.L's 8.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist	8.88%	7.86%	6.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLD and JEPG.L in my portfolio?

QYLD and JEPG.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QYLD or JEPG.L?

On fees, JEPG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLD or JEPG.L?

JEPG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between QYLD and JEPG.L?

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JEPG.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.35% for JEPG.L.