PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. HYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. HYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%

HYLD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. HYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.80%-11.48%5.41%3.11%7.16%0.25%8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and HYLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.23

The correlation between QYLD and HYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QYLD vs. HYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QYLD
HYLD

Technology

53.8%
34.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.0%

Industrials

2.8%
3.4%

Utilities

1.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.0%

Energy

0.6%
29.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.2%

Technology

QYLD
53.8%
HYLD
34.8%

Communication Services

QYLD
15.8%
HYLD
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLD
12.3%
HYLD
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

QYLD
7.7%
HYLD
4.7%

Healthcare

QYLD
4.2%
HYLD
5.0%

Industrials

QYLD
2.8%
HYLD
3.4%

Utilities

QYLD
1.4%
HYLD
1.1%

Basic Materials

QYLD
1.1%
HYLD
0.0%

Energy

QYLD
0.6%
HYLD
29.9%

Financial Services

QYLD
0.2%
HYLD
0.5%

Real Estate

QYLD
0.1%
HYLD
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. HYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. HYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLDHYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.36

QYLD vs. HYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLDHYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. HYLD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDHYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

QYLD vs. HYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDHYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

QYLD vs. HYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. HYLD - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, while HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%7.86%6.45%7.52%7.46%7.97%7.18%6.59%10.87%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and HYLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.00% for HYLD.

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HYLD is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Eve Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 1.29% for HYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and HYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer