QYLD vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. QYLD is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, QYLD returned 23.80% vs 25.72% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

QYLD vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 10.28% return.

QYLD

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

GPIX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.95%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.36%	9.28%	19.35%	7.11%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	10.28%	16.25%	21.77%	13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and GPIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.84

The correlation between QYLD and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLD vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLD	GPIX
Technology	58.7%	39.2%
Communication Services	14.3%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	4.4%
Healthcare	3.7%	8.3%
Industrials	2.6%	7.7%
Utilities	1.2%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.7%
Energy	0.5%	3.2%
Financial Services	0.2%	10.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

QYLD vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QYLD	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.42	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.30	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.46	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	3.35	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.11	16.40	+10.70

QYLD vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLD	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-17.50%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.97%	-7.71%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.14%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-1.48%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	1.57%	-0.69%

Volatility

QYLD vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) have volatilities of 3.87% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLD	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	4.00%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	8.63%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	10.69%	-1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	13.88%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.53%	13.88%	+1.65%

QYLD vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLD vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than GPIX's 7.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	7.97%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.41%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLD and GPIX in my portfolio?

QYLD and GPIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QYLD or GPIX?

GPIX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to QYLD (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, QYLD or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.72% vs 23.80% for QYLD. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QYLD or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 23.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLD or GPIX?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QYLD or GPIX?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.41%, compared with 7.97% for GPIX.

What is the main difference between QYLD and GPIX?

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.29% for GPIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.