QYLD vs. DIVO
QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. QYLD is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QYLD returned 8.43%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for DIVO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
QYLD vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 5.53% return.
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.53% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD and DIVO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.57 |
The correlation between QYLD and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
QYLD vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QYLD
DIVO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QYLD
DIVO
Communication Services
QYLD
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
QYLD
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
QYLD
DIVO
Healthcare
QYLD
DIVO
Industrials
QYLD
DIVO
Utilities
QYLD
DIVO
Basic Materials
QYLD
DIVO
Energy
QYLD
DIVO
Financial Services
QYLD
DIVO
Real Estate
QYLD
DIVO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD
DIVO
QYLD vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QYLD | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.36 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 3.10 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.36 | 11.21 | +17.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLD | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.06 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.89 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.85 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
QYLD vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -30.04% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -5.95% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -12.12% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | -13.72% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.82% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -2.61% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 1.64% | -0.79% |
Volatility
QYLD vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 1.85%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 2.01% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 6.88% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.58% | 8.97% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 11.94% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 14.84% | +0.65% |
QYLD vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLD vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, more than DIVO's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.42% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD and DIVO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVO has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.61% vs 8.43% for QYLD. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 6.42% for DIVO.
QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.56% for DIVO.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QYLD and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer