PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 5.53% return.


QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%

DIVO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.82%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.53%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%21.41%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and DIVO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.57

The correlation between QYLD and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLD vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QYLD
DIVO

Technology

53.8%
14.5%

Communication Services

15.8%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
6.7%

Industrials

2.8%
16.2%

Utilities

1.4%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.1%

Energy

0.6%
6.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
30.3%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QYLD
53.8%
DIVO
14.5%

Communication Services

QYLD
15.8%
DIVO
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLD
12.3%
DIVO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

QYLD
7.7%
DIVO
6.9%

Healthcare

QYLD
4.2%
DIVO
6.7%

Industrials

QYLD
2.8%
DIVO
16.2%

Utilities

QYLD
1.4%
DIVO
2.0%

Basic Materials

QYLD
1.1%
DIVO
4.1%

Energy

QYLD
0.6%
DIVO
6.8%

Financial Services

QYLD
0.2%
DIVO
30.3%

Real Estate

QYLD
0.1%
DIVO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLDDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.36

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

3.10

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.36

11.21

+17.15

QYLD vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLDDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.06

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.89

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.85

-0.26

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-30.04%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-5.95%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-12.12%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-13.72%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.82%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-2.61%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.64%

-0.79%

Volatility

QYLD vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 1.85%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

2.01%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

6.88%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

8.97%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

11.94%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

14.84%

+0.65%

QYLD vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, more than DIVO's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.42%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and DIVO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVO has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.61% vs 8.43% for QYLD. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 6.42% for DIVO.

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.56% for DIVO.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer