PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QWTM.L is traded in GBp, while BUGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BUGG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QWTM.L achieves a 51.52% return, which is significantly higher than BUGG.L's 18.95% return.


QWTM.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
20.99%
YTD
51.52%
6M
41.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUGG.L

1D
-1.62%
1M
32.12%
YTD
18.95%
6M
13.63%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QWTM.L and BUGG.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QWTM.L

BUGG.L
BUGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BUGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QWTM.LBUGG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.11

0.07

+3.05

Drawdowns

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QWTM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum BUGG.L drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWTM.L and BUGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QWTM.LBUGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-40.14%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-6.67%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-15.07%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.98%

Volatility

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QWTM.LBUGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.18%

29.70%

+9.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.18%

30.35%

+8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.18%

30.35%

+8.83%

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QWTM.L and BUGG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

QWTM.L vs. BUGG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QWTM.L nor BUGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QWTM.L and BUGG.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QWTM.L and BUGG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while BUGG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QWTM.L and BUGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer