PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX).

BUGG.L and NDQ.AX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUGG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. NDQ.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jul 20, 2020. Both BUGG.L and NDQ.AX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUGG.L
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating		-17.93%-11.39%11.20%36.05%-27.30%-5.56%
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		-6.03%12.34%27.89%45.65%-24.93%0.25%
Different Trading Currencies

BUGG.L is traded in GBP, while NDQ.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the NDQ.AX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUGG.L achieves a -17.93% return, which is significantly lower than NDQ.AX's -6.03% return.

BUGG.L

1D
0.19%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-17.93%
6M
-28.43%
1Y
-24.13%
3Y*
-0.12%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

NDQ.AX

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
19.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF

Often compared with BUGG.L:
BUGG.L vs. BUGBUGG.L vs. FCBR.LBUGG.L vs. CIBRBUGG.L vs. VOOBUGG.L vs. VGTBUGG.L vs. AQWG.LBUGG.L vs. BKCG.L
Often compared with NDQ.AX:
NDQ.AX vs. QQQNDQ.AX vs. IVVNDQ.AX vs. IOONDQ.AX vs. BTC-USDNDQ.AX vs. TQQQNDQ.AX vs. SCHGNDQ.AX vs. JPM

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUGG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NDQ.AX's 0.48% expense ratio.

BUGG.L
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF

Return for Risk

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BUGG.L
BUGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BUGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX
NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BUGG.LNDQ.AXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.96

0.99

-1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.22

1.50

-2.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.21

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

1.48

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.80

4.56

-6.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUGG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUGG.L and NDQ.AX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BUGG.LNDQ.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

0.99

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.65

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.92

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.88

-1.10

Correlation

The correlation between BUGG.L and NDQ.AX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Dividend Comparison

BUGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUGG.L
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		1.82%1.67%1.86%2.17%3.36%3.33%2.47%2.22%0.52%0.45%0.43%

Drawdowns

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUGG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.16%, which is greater than NDQ.AX's maximum drawdown of -28.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUGG.L and NDQ.AX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

BUGG.LNDQ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.16%

-30.79%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.90%

-15.17%

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-30.79%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.79%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.61%

-15.15%

-20.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.67%

-5.90%

-8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.13%

5.53%

+8.60%

Volatility

BUGG.L vs. NDQ.AX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) at 6.02%. This indicates that BUGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDQ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

BUGG.LNDQ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

6.02%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.76%

11.69%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

21.87%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.45%

20.48%

+8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.45%

20.76%

+8.69%