QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L
QWTM.L (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and HSTE.L (HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - QWTM.L tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index while HSTE.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QWTM.L is traded in GBp, while HSTE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HSTE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QWTM.L achieves a 51.52% return, which is significantly higher than HSTE.L's -10.04% return.
QWTM.L
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 20.99%
- YTD
- 51.52%
- 6M
- 41.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSTE.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -10.04%
- 6M
- -12.09%
- 1Y
- -3.99%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 51.52% | 19.86% |
HSTE.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | -10.04% | -2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QWTM.L and HSTE.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L — Risk / Return Rank
QWTM.L
HSTE.L
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QWTM.L | HSTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.11 | -0.23 | +3.34 |
Drawdowns
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QWTM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum HSTE.L drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWTM.L and HSTE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QWTM.L | HSTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -69.87% | +46.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -52.40% | +48.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -49.98% | +39.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.50% | — |
Volatility
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QWTM.L | HSTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.18% | 26.54% | +12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 38.02% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 37.70% | +1.48% |
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QWTM.L and HSTE.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
QWTM.L vs. HSTE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QWTM.L nor HSTE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QWTM.L and HSTE.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QWTM.L and HSTE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while HSTE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and HSBC.
Find the right allocation for QWTM.L and HSTE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer