BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L).
BUGG.L and FCBR.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUGG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. FCBR.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on May 27, 2020. Both BUGG.L and FCBR.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUGG.L Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -16.67% | -11.39% | 11.20% | 36.05% | -27.30% | -5.56% |
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | -12.23% | -0.06% | 20.93% | 33.00% | -18.86% | -3.49% |
Different Trading Currencies
BUGG.L is traded in GBP, while FCBR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FCBR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUGG.L achieves a -16.67% return, which is significantly lower than FCBR.L's -12.23% return.
BUGG.L
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- -16.67%
- 6M
- -27.00%
- 1Y
- -24.33%
- 3Y*
- 0.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCBR.L
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- -12.23%
- 6M
- -16.93%
- 1Y
- -5.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUGG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FCBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUGG.L
FCBR.L
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUGG.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | -0.25 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | -0.19 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.97 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.27 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | -0.72 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUGG.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | -0.25 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.46 | -0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUGG.L and FCBR.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUGG.L nor FCBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUGG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.16%, which is greater than FCBR.L's maximum drawdown of -26.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUGG.L and FCBR.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUGG.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.16% | -26.10% | -12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.90% | -24.29% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.63% | -21.44% | -13.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -8.95% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.22% | 9.14% | +5.08% |
Volatility
BUGG.L vs. FCBR.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) at 6.04%. This indicates that BUGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUGG.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 6.04% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.79% | 16.92% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.21% | 23.12% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 21.99% | +7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 22.17% | +7.27% |