PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QWLD vs. VEGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QWLD vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QWLD achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than VEGN's 23.72% return.


QWLD

1D
0.22%
1M
1.63%
6M
6.46%
YTD
9.39%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
10.49%

VEGN

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.86%
6M
22.47%
YTD
23.72%
1Y
37.13%
3Y*
23.68%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$231.12K$297.84K$1.04M
$398.12K$577.59K$470.77K

QWLD vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
9.39%17.93%14.44%19.59%-13.30%21.57%10.24%7.62%
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
23.72%13.71%25.42%38.10%-26.87%26.01%27.72%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QWLD and VEGN is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2019

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between QWLD and VEGN has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QWLD vs. VEGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QWLD
VEGN

Technology

24.9%
63.6%

Financial Services

16.5%
13.1%

Healthcare

13.2%
3.9%

Industrials

10.9%
4.8%

Communication Services

9.5%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
1.8%

Utilities

3.8%
0.1%

Energy

3.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

2.5%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
3.9%

Technology

QWLD
24.9%
VEGN
63.6%

Financial Services

QWLD
16.5%
VEGN
13.1%

Healthcare

QWLD
13.2%
VEGN
3.9%

Industrials

QWLD
10.9%
VEGN
4.8%

Communication Services

QWLD
9.5%
VEGN
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

QWLD
8.1%
VEGN
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QWLD
6.3%
VEGN
1.8%

Utilities

QWLD
3.8%
VEGN
0.1%

Energy

QWLD
3.4%
VEGN
0.0%

Basic Materials

QWLD
2.5%
VEGN
0.5%

Real Estate

QWLD
1.0%
VEGN
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QWLD vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QWLD
QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGN
VEGN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VEGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QWLD vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QWLDVEGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.84

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

9.45

+1.23

QWLD vs. VEGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QWLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the VEGN Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QWLD and VEGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QWLD vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QWLD drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, smaller than the maximum VEGN drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWLD and VEGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QWLDVEGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-34.14%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-12.25%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.40%

-20.91%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.84%

-33.40%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.77%

+8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-7.52%

+3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

3.68%

-1.93%

Volatility

QWLD vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) is 2.30%, while US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that QWLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QWLDVEGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

7.86%

-5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

17.87%

-10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

20.38%

-10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

20.97%

-7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

23.03%

-7.91%

QWLD vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QWLD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

QWLD vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison

QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than VEGN's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
1.79%1.85%1.74%1.78%2.02%1.77%1.77%2.13%2.33%2.73%2.22%3.42%
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
0.52%0.51%0.51%0.67%0.81%0.41%0.71%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QWLD and VEGN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEGN has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QWLD dropped -31.89% vs VEGN's -34.14%.

On 5-year performance, VEGN leads with 13.97% vs 10.03% for QWLD. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEGN has performed better with a 13.97% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VEGN.

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.52% for VEGN.

QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while VEGN tracks US Vegan Climate Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QWLD and 0.60% for VEGN.

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QWLD and VEGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer