QWLD vs. QARP
QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QWLD tracks the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD) while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QWLD returned 10.14%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QWLD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
QWLD vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QWLD achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.
QWLD
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 16.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
QWLD vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 8.28% | 17.93% | 14.44% | 19.59% | -13.30% | 21.57% | 10.24% | 27.59% | -5.10% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QWLD and QARP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between QWLD and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QWLD vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QWLD
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QWLD
QARP
Financial Services
QWLD
QARP
Healthcare
QWLD
QARP
Industrials
QWLD
QARP
Communication Services
QWLD
QARP
Consumer Defensive
QWLD
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
QWLD
QARP
Utilities
QWLD
QARP
Energy
QWLD
QARP
Basic Materials
QWLD
QARP
Real Estate
QWLD
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QWLD vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
QWLD
QARP
QWLD vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QWLD | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.46 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 15.38 | -5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QWLD vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QWLD drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWLD and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QWLD | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -35.44% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.66% | -7.26% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.40% | -15.65% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.84% | -22.75% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -4.39% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.63% | +0.15% |
Volatility
QWLD vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) is 2.03%, while Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that QWLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QWLD | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 2.76% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 8.22% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 10.58% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 15.54% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 19.55% | -4.44% |
QWLD vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QWLD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
QWLD vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 1.81% | 1.85% | 1.74% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.33% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QWLD and QARP have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QARP has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to QWLD (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QWLD dropped -31.89% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 10.14% for QWLD. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QWLD.
QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.
QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QWLD and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QWLD and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer