QWLD vs. GQGU
QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QWLD is passively managed, while GQGU is actively managed. Over the past year, QWLD returned 16.23% vs 4.92% for GQGU. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QWLD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
QWLD vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QWLD achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 6.11% return.
QWLD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 16.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
GQGU
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QWLD vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 8.08% | 7.53% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.11% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between QWLD and GQGU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QWLD vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
QWLD
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QWLD vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QWLD | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QWLD vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QWLD drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWLD and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QWLD | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -8.41% | -23.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.66% | -8.41% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -5.09% | +4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -2.88% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | — | — |
Volatility
QWLD vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QWLD | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 10.74% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 10.74% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 10.74% | +4.37% |
QWLD vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QWLD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QWLD vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 1.81% | 1.85% | 1.74% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.33% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QWLD and GQGU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, QWLD leads with 16.23% vs 4.92% for GQGU. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 16.23% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.
QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.96% for GQGU.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QWLD and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for QWLD and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer