PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVOY vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QVOY vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QVOY vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QVOY
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
4.39%16.45%1.55%17.19%-0.53%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
-0.53%4.51%5.36%2.24%0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVOY achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's -0.53% return.


QVOY

1D
0.47%
1M
-6.52%
YTD
4.39%
6M
7.32%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
10Y*

MFUL

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVOY vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVOY has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QVOY vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVOY
QVOY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QVOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVOY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QVOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVOY vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVOYMFULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

0.69

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

0.94

+1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.14

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

0.94

+1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.60

3.33

+6.27

QVOY vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVOY Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVOY and MFUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVOYMFULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.69

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

-0.20

+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between QVOY and MFUL is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QVOY vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

QVOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than MFUL's 3.13% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
QVOY
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
8.91%9.30%10.88%6.03%0.46%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.13%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%

Drawdowns

QVOY vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVOY drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOY and MFUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QVOYMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-16.41%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-3.77%

-5.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-4.13%

-2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-9.80%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.06%

+1.72%

Volatility

QVOY vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.89%. This indicates that QVOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QVOYMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

1.89%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

3.10%

+10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

4.75%

+13.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

4.22%

+10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

4.22%

+10.82%