QVMS vs. VFMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF).
QVMS and VFMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVMS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. VFMF is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Performance
QVMS vs. VFMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QVMS vs. VFMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 3.59% | 5.56% | 9.50% | 16.89% | -14.61% | 4.45% |
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 3.32% | 17.38% | 15.60% | 18.52% | -5.70% | 7.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMS achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than VFMF's 3.32% return.
QVMS
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMF
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVMS vs. VFMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QVMS vs. VFMF — Risk / Return Rank
QVMS
VFMF
QVMS vs. VFMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMS | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.33 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.90 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.93 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | 8.90 | -3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMS | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.33 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.51 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMS and VFMF is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QVMS vs. VFMF - Dividend Comparison
QVMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than VFMF's 1.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 1.53% | 1.54% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 2.21% | 1.39% | 1.56% | 1.61% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
QVMS vs. VFMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMS drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum VFMF drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMS and VFMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMS | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.05% | -41.34% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -13.32% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -4.99% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -5.85% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 2.88% | +0.80% |
Volatility
QVMS vs. VFMF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) at 4.62%. This indicates that QVMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QVMS | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 4.62% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.01% | 10.05% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 18.79% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 18.25% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.31% | +0.10% |