PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMM vs. USMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVMM vs. USMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 4.49% return.


QVMM

1D
0.98%
1M
0.51%
6M
10.99%
YTD
16.68%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.77%

USMF

1D
0.48%
1M
0.58%
6M
3.78%
YTD
4.49%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.16K$30.58K$38.08K
$1.09M$1.05M$1.76M

QVMM vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
16.68%8.82%13.36%15.43%-13.06%6.20%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
4.49%4.60%19.65%13.47%-8.82%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMM and USMF is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.89

The correlation between QVMM and USMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QVMM vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVMM
USMF

Industrials

27.1%
9.9%

Technology

16.1%
35.6%

Financial Services

14.6%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.4%

Healthcare

7.8%
9.7%

Real Estate

7.7%
2.0%

Energy

4.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.5%

Utilities

2.6%
2.1%

Communication Services

0.9%
10.3%

Industrials

QVMM
27.1%
USMF
9.9%

Technology

QVMM
16.1%
USMF
35.6%

Financial Services

QVMM
14.6%
USMF
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QVMM
10.4%
USMF
10.4%

Healthcare

QVMM
7.8%
USMF
9.7%

Real Estate

QVMM
7.7%
USMF
2.0%

Energy

QVMM
4.9%
USMF
2.7%

Basic Materials

QVMM
4.8%
USMF
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

QVMM
3.2%
USMF
4.5%

Utilities

QVMM
2.6%
USMF
2.1%

Communication Services

QVMM
0.9%
USMF
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVMM vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QVMM
QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

USMF
USMF Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QVMM vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVMMUSMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.11

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.12

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

3.41

+7.71

QVMM vs. USMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the USMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMM and USMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVMM vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and USMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMMUSMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-36.24%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-6.47%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.00%

-15.39%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

-18.10%

-5.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.03%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-4.12%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.12%

+0.20%

Volatility

QVMM vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) is 3.57%, while WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that QVMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMMUSMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.77%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

9.26%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

11.68%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

14.40%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

16.95%

+2.37%

QVMM vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVMM vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison

QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than USMF's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.14%1.32%1.29%1.42%1.51%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
1.31%1.37%1.22%1.33%1.74%1.42%1.34%1.38%1.45%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVMM and USMF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USMF has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to QVMM (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs USMF's -36.24%.

On 5-year performance, QVMM leads with 8.91% vs 7.47% for USMF. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 8.91% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for USMF.

USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.14% for QVMM.

QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while USMF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.28% for USMF.

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVMM and USMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer