PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMM vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVMM vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.


QVMM

1D
0.09%
1M
3.49%
YTD
14.47%
6M
14.87%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10Y*

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMM vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
14.47%8.82%13.36%15.43%-13.06%6.04%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMM and SPHD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.68

The correlation between QVMM and SPHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QVMM vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVMM
SPHD

Industrials

26.5%
0.0%

Financial Services

15.2%
15.6%

Technology

13.8%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
3.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
5.1%

Real Estate

7.6%
20.1%

Energy

5.5%
14.1%

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
17.8%

Utilities

3.3%
13.7%

Communication Services

0.9%
8.6%

Industrials

QVMM
26.5%
SPHD
0.0%

Financial Services

QVMM
15.2%
SPHD
15.6%

Technology

QVMM
13.8%
SPHD
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QVMM
10.0%
SPHD
3.4%

Healthcare

QVMM
8.7%
SPHD
5.1%

Real Estate

QVMM
7.6%
SPHD
20.1%

Energy

QVMM
5.5%
SPHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

QVMM
4.7%
SPHD

-

Consumer Defensive

QVMM
4.0%
SPHD
17.8%

Utilities

QVMM
3.3%
SPHD
13.7%

Communication Services

QVMM
0.9%
SPHD
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVMM vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMM
QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMM vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMMSPHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

0.74

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

1.15

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.13

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.11

+2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.48

2.78

+8.70

QVMM vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMM and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMMSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

0.74

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.58

-0.13

Drawdowns

QVMM vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMMSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-41.39%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-7.33%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.00%

-13.29%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.37%

+5.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-4.70%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.93%

-0.63%

Volatility

QVMM vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that QVMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMMSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

2.99%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

7.55%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

11.04%

+4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

14.16%

+5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

17.64%

+1.84%

QVMM vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVMM vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.16%1.32%1.29%1.42%1.51%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVMM and SPHD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVMM has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 3-year performance, QVMM leads with 16.65% vs 11.42% for SPHD. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 16.65% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.16% for QVMM.

QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while SPHD is S&P 500. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.30% for SPHD.

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVMM and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer