QVAL vs. VMOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT).
QVAL and VMOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVAL is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. VMOT is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index. It was launched on May 3, 2017.
Performance
QVAL vs. VMOT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QVAL vs. VMOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 7.89% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 34.40% | -5.93% | 24.06% | -17.28% | 20.81% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 8.20% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 4.59% | -15.64% | 14.62% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QVAL having a 7.89% return and VMOT slightly higher at 8.20%.
QVAL
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
VMOT
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVAL vs. VMOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than VMOT's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. VMOT — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
VMOT
QVAL vs. VMOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVAL | VMOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.74 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.36 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.51 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 10.98 | -3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVAL | VMOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.74 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.35 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.29 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and VMOT is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QVAL vs. VMOT - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than VMOT's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 1.90% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. VMOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than VMOT's maximum drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and VMOT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | VMOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -34.71% | -16.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.61% | -13.08% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -23.73% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -5.82% | +3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -13.55% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.99% | +0.41% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. VMOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 4.23%, while Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | VMOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 7.71% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 11.88% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 18.91% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 15.66% | +5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 14.83% | +7.97% |