QVAL vs. SPVM
QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) and SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVAL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while SPVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. QVAL is actively managed, while SPVM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVAL returned 11.91%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for SPVM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QVAL charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SPVM.
Performance
QVAL vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 9.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QVAL having a 11.91% annualized return and SPVM not far ahead at 12.34%.
QVAL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 14.09%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
SPVM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
QVAL vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.09% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 34.40% | -5.93% | 24.06% | -17.28% | 25.59% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 9.93% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and SPVM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between QVAL and SPVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVAL vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVAL
SPVM
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
QVAL
SPVM
Energy
QVAL
SPVM
Industrials
QVAL
SPVM
Healthcare
QVAL
SPVM
Consumer Defensive
QVAL
SPVM
Technology
QVAL
SPVM
Communication Services
QVAL
SPVM
Basic Materials
QVAL
SPVM
Utilities
QVAL
SPVM
Real Estate
QVAL
SPVM
Financial Services
QVAL
-
SPVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
SPVM
QVAL vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVAL | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 4.43 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | 16.80 | -3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than SPVM's maximum drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and SPVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -45.35% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -6.57% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -18.66% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -19.48% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | -45.35% | -6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -0.87% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -4.98% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.73% | +0.42% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.27%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.27% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 7.72% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 11.64% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 16.74% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 19.56% | +3.22% |
QVAL vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVAL vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than SPVM's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.16% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 2.02% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVAL and SPVM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVAL has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to SPVM (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs SPVM's -45.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPVM leads with 12.34% vs 11.91% for QVAL. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.16% for QVAL.
QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVAL and SPVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer