QVAL vs. QMOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM).
QVAL and QMOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVAL is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. QMOM is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015.
Performance
QVAL vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QVAL vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 7.30% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 34.40% | -5.93% | 24.06% | -17.28% | 25.59% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 4.62% | 2.36% | 30.43% | 9.50% | -6.99% | -4.06% | 61.94% | 28.39% | -11.75% | 15.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly higher than QMOM's 4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has underperformed QMOM with an annualized return of 10.16%, while QMOM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
QVAL
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
QMOM
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 15.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVAL vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QVAL and QMOM have an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
QMOM
QVAL vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVAL | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 0.61 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 0.97 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.35 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 4.68 | +2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVAL | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.61 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and QMOM is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QVAL vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than QMOM's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 1.40% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 0.12% | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.13% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than QMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and QMOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -39.13% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.61% | -13.55% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -27.00% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | -39.13% | -12.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -7.48% | +4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -13.11% | +5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 3.92% | -0.53% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 4.37%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 12.00% | -7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 19.09% | -8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 25.78% | -5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 24.72% | -3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 26.28% | -3.48% |