PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. NIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 18.29% return.


QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%

NIXT

1D
-1.51%
1M
1.69%
YTD
18.29%
6M
17.24%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%4.87%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
18.29%4.94%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and NIXT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.81

The correlation between QVAL and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALNIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

2.87

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

9.69

+4.29

QVAL vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALNIXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.59

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.71

-0.22

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and NIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALNIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-27.75%

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-11.71%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.37%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-5.96%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

3.47%

-1.34%

Volatility

QVAL vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 4.16%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALNIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

5.00%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

14.08%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

21.24%

-6.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

23.31%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

23.31%

-0.52%

QVAL vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than NIXT's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.35%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and NIXT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to QVAL (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 29.65% for QVAL. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 29.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.09% for NIXT.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and NIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer