PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. CVAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QVAL vs. CVAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Cultivar ETF (CVAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QVAL vs. CVAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
7.89%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%2.62%
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
-0.40%14.95%3.12%11.74%-5.03%0.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than CVAR's -0.40% return.


QVAL

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
7.89%
6M
12.39%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
10.22%

CVAR

1D
1.10%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
1.93%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVAL vs. CVAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CVAR's 0.87% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. CVAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CVAR
CVAR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CVAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CVAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. CVAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Cultivar ETF (CVAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALCVARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

0.71

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.10

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.01

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.37

3.64

+3.73

QVAL vs. CVAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the CVAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and CVAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALCVARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

0.71

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.36

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and CVAR is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QVAL vs. CVAR - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than CVAR's 1.53% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.55%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
1.53%1.53%3.57%1.41%5.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. CVAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than CVAR's maximum drawdown of -19.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and CVAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALCVARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-19.39%

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.61%

-10.62%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-7.18%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-5.49%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.97%

+0.43%

Volatility

QVAL vs. CVAR - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Cultivar ETF (CVAR) at 3.76%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QVALCVARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.76%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

8.81%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

14.80%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.64%

15.70%

+5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

15.70%

+7.10%