PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVAR vs. MDYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVAR vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVAR vs. MDYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
-0.40%14.95%3.12%11.74%-5.03%0.71%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.05%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%1.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVAR achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than MDYV's 1.05% return.


CVAR

1D
1.10%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
1.93%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
10Y*

MDYV

1D
2.37%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
1.05%
6M
3.03%
1Y
12.66%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVAR vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVAR has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than MDYV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CVAR vs. MDYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVAR
CVAR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CVAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CVAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVAR vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVARMDYVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.62

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

1.01

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

0.91

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.64

3.42

+0.22

CVAR vs. MDYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the MDYV Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVAR and MDYV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVARMDYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.62

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.40

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between CVAR and MDYV is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CVAR vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison

CVAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than MDYV's 1.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
1.53%1.53%3.57%1.41%5.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.86%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Drawdowns

CVAR vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVAR drawdown since its inception was -19.39%, smaller than the maximum MDYV drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVAR and MDYV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVARMDYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.39%

-60.71%

+41.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-14.55%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-7.55%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-8.68%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.86%

-0.89%

Volatility

CVAR vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) is 3.76%, while SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that CVAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVARMDYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

5.35%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

11.43%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

20.68%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

19.57%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

21.90%

-6.20%