QUS vs. SCHX
QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUS returned 13.54%/yr vs 15.03%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
QUS vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, QUS has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 13.54%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.
QUS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 19.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.75%
SCHX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.01M | $4.81M | $3.43M | |
| $244.71M | $275.73M | $370.20M |
QUS vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 10.23% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.65% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUS and SCHX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QUS and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QUS vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUS
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUS
SCHX
Financial Services
QUS
SCHX
Healthcare
QUS
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
QUS
SCHX
Communication Services
QUS
SCHX
Industrials
QUS
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
QUS
SCHX
Utilities
QUS
SCHX
Energy
QUS
SCHX
Basic Materials
QUS
SCHX
Real Estate
QUS
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUS vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
QUS
SCHX
QUS vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUS | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.53 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.95 | 10.64 | +2.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUS vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUS | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -34.33% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -9.02% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.94% | -19.04% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.30% | -25.41% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.78% | -34.33% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -3.95% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 2.14% | -0.61% |
Volatility
QUS vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is 2.42%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that QUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUS | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 3.70% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 10.19% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.22% | 12.91% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 17.25% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 18.16% | -1.76% |
QUS vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUS vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than SCHX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUS and SCHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUS dropped -33.78% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.03% vs 13.54% for QUS. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUS and 0.03% for SCHX.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUS and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer