PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUS vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUS vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 14.12% return.


QUS

1D
0.83%
1M
1.29%
6M
7.60%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
13.54%
ALL TIME*
12.75%

QARP

1D
0.91%
1M
2.62%
6M
8.69%
YTD
14.12%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$114.19K$118.59K$179.68K
$3.01M$4.81M$3.43M

QUS vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
10.23%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-2.78%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
14.12%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between QUS and QARP is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.93

The correlation between QUS and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

QUS vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUS
QARP

Technology

28.4%
24.1%

Financial Services

15.7%
12.4%

Healthcare

14.4%
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
9.5%

Communication Services

8.2%
10.5%

Industrials

8.1%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.4%

Utilities

3.9%
1.9%

Energy

3.3%
6.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.0%

Technology

QUS
28.4%
QARP
24.1%

Financial Services

QUS
15.7%
QARP
12.4%

Healthcare

QUS
14.4%
QARP
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

QUS
8.3%
QARP
9.5%

Communication Services

QUS
8.2%
QARP
10.5%

Industrials

QUS
8.1%
QARP
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QUS
5.7%
QARP
9.4%

Utilities

QUS
3.9%
QARP
1.9%

Energy

QUS
3.3%
QARP
6.3%

Basic Materials

QUS
2.2%
QARP
2.5%

Real Estate

QUS
1.6%
QARP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUS vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QUS vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUSQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.73

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

16.67

-3.72

QUS vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUS and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUS vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUSQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-35.44%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-7.26%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-15.65%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

-22.75%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-4.37%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.62%

-0.09%

Volatility

QUS vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is 2.42%, while Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that QUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUSQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.64%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

8.20%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.22%

10.68%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

15.53%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

19.51%

-3.11%

QUS vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUS vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than QARP's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.01%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.27%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, QUS and QARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QARP has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUS dropped -33.78% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.94% vs 10.91% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.01% for QARP.

QUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QARP is Quality Factor. QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUS and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUS and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer