QUS vs. QARP
QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD) while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUS returned 11.08%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
QUS vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 10.34% return.
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
QARP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
QUS vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.28% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 10.34% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUS and QARP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between QUS and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUS vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUS
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUS
QARP
Financial Services
QUS
QARP
Healthcare
QUS
QARP
Communication Services
QUS
QARP
Consumer Defensive
QUS
QARP
Industrials
QUS
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
QUS
QARP
Energy
QUS
QARP
Utilities
QUS
QARP
Basic Materials
QUS
QARP
Real Estate
QUS
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUS vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
QUS
QARP
QUS vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUS | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 2.43 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 3.46 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.46 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 15.79 | -4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUS | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.43 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.72 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
QUS vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUS | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -35.44% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -7.26% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.94% | -15.65% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.30% | -22.75% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.98% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -4.44% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.59% | -0.06% |
Volatility
QUS vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is 1.78%, while Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that QUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUS | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.21% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 7.71% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.09% | 10.36% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 15.51% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 19.65% | -3.23% |
QUS vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUS vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than QARP's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, QUS and QARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QARP has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUS dropped -33.78% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.06% vs 11.08% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.
QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD), while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUS and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUS and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer