QULL vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QULL is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QULL returned 16.15%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for QTAP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

QULL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QULL having a 14.81% return and QTAP slightly lower at 14.67%.

QULL

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 8.71%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 14.51%
• 1Y: 38.22%
• 3Y*: 32.28%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 25.59%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: 13.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QULL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN	14.81%	17.61%	38.03%	57.07%	-42.00%	38.78%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	14.67%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-25.87%	15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and QTAP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021	0.85

The correlation between QULL and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QULL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QULL

QULL Risk / Return Rank: 45
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QULL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QULL	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	4.62	-3.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	8.50	-6.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	2.23	-0.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	15.20	-13.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.22	80.04	-70.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QULL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QULL Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QULL and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QULL	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	4.62	-3.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.73	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.75	-0.20

Drawdowns

QULL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QULL	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.83%	-29.44%	-22.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.43%	-1.69%	-16.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.82%	-13.03%	-23.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.83%	-29.44%	-22.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.10%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-5.04%	-9.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	0.32%	+3.83%

Volatility

QULL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.33%. This indicates that QULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QULL	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	1.33%	+3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.79%	3.97%	+14.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	5.56%	+18.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.62%	18.89%	+16.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.15%	18.77%	+16.38%

QULL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

QULL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither QULL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QULL and QTAP in my portfolio?

QULL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QULL or QTAP?

QULL has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QULL dropped -51.83% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, QULL or QTAP?

On 5-year performance, QULL leads with 16.15% vs 13.78% for QTAP. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QULL or QTAP?

Over the 5-year period, QULL has performed better with a 16.15% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QULL or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QULL or QTAP?

QULL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QULL and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QULL and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.