QULL vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QULL is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

QULL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

QULL

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 12.45%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: 37.24%
• 3Y*: 30.07%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QULL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN	12.45%	8.42%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and LINT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

QULL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QULL

QULL Risk / Return Rank: 47
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QULL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QULL	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.00	—	—

Drawdowns

QULL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, roughly equal to the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QULL	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.83%	-49.54%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.03%	-12.86%	+7.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.93%	-20.48%	+6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QULL	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.70%	168.83%	-144.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.68%	168.83%	-133.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.06%	168.83%	-133.77%

QULL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

QULL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QULL and LINT in my portfolio?

QULL and LINT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QULL or LINT?

On fees, QULL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QULL or LINT?

QULL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QULL or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.

What is the main difference between QULL and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QULL and 0.97% for LINT.