PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUIK vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QUIK vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUIK achieves a 143.59% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's -6.65% return.


QUIK

1D
-6.45%
1M
-32.87%
6M
101.38%
YTD
143.59%
1Y
128.39%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
19.69%
10Y*
1.09%

LUNR

1D
-6.13%
1M
-43.09%
6M
-21.09%
YTD
-6.65%
1Y
39.50%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUIK vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QUIK
QuickLogic Corporation
143.59%-46.81%-18.47%169.65%0.59%-30.85%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
-6.65%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QUIK and LUNR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.23

The correlation between QUIK and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QUIK:

$259.48M

LUNR:

$2.41B

EPS

QUIK:

-$0.89

LUNR:

-$0.00

PS Ratio

QUIK:

16.90

LUNR:

2.24K

Total Revenue (TTM)

QUIK:

$14.50M

LUNR:

$334.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

QUIK:

$3.00M

LUNR:

$85.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

QUIK:

-$7.15M

LUNR:

-$96.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUIK vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUIK
QUIK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
QUIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUIK Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QUIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUIK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUIK vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUIKLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.15

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

0.59

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

1.55

+7.34

QUIK vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUIK Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUIK and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUIK vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUIK drawdown since its inception was -99.59%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUIK and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUIKLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.59%

-97.43%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.33%

-66.85%

+28.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.85%

-78.09%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.30%

-81.52%

-15.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.62%

-63.42%

-28.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.50%

25.58%

-11.08%

Volatility

QUIK vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) have volatilities of 28.58% and 27.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUIKLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.58%

27.82%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.71%

87.62%

-21.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.17%

112.21%

-29.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.07%

170.21%

-101.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.03%

170.21%

-92.18%

Dividends

QUIK vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUIK nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QUIK vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QuickLogic Corporation and Intuitive Machines, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.05M
186.73M
(QUIK) Total Revenue
(LUNR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QUIK vs. LUNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between QuickLogic Corporation and Intuitive Machines, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
36.5%
39.0%
Portfolio components
QUIK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.84M and revenue of 5.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.

LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

QUIK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported an operating income of -2.11M and revenue of 5.05M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.7%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

QUIK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported a net income of -2.21M and revenue of 5.05M, resulting in a net margin of -43.7%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QUIK and LUNR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUIK has higher volatility (28.58%) compared to LUNR (27.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUIK dropped -99.59% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

QUIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUIK and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer