QUIK vs. AEHR
QUIK (QuickLogic Corporation) and AEHR (Aehr Test Systems) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — QUIK in Semiconductors, AEHR in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, QUIK returned -0.55%/yr vs 45.82%/yr for AEHR. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
QUIK vs. AEHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUIK achieves a 118.14% return, which is significantly lower than AEHR's 296.14% return. Over the past 10 years, QUIK has underperformed AEHR with an annualized return of -0.55%, while AEHR has yielded a comparatively higher 45.82% annualized return.
QUIK
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -18.16%
- 6M
- 78.12%
- YTD
- 118.14%
- 1Y
- 112.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 19.86%
- 10Y*
- -0.55%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.75%
AEHR
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 14.32%
- 6M
- 211.93%
- YTD
- 296.14%
- 1Y
- 374.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 70.08%
- 10Y*
- 45.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $231.69M | $269.50M | $230.50M | |
| $3.95M | $4.63M | $10.05M |
QUIK vs. AEHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUIK QuickLogic Corporation | 118.14% | -46.81% | -18.47% | 169.65% | 0.59% | 34.83% | -36.83% | -41.61% | -57.82% | 25.18% |
AEHR Aehr Test Systems | 296.14% | 21.41% | -37.32% | 31.99% | -16.87% | 855.73% | 26.50% | 41.84% | -47.97% | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUIK and AEHR is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 1999 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, QUIK and AEHR have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
QUIK:
$232.36M
AEHR:
$2.61B
QUIK:
-$0.89
AEHR:
-$0.23
QUIK:
15.14
AEHR:
49.52
QUIK:
9.44
AEHR:
12.09
QUIK:
$14.50M
AEHR:
$50.00M
QUIK:
$3.00M
AEHR:
$17.65M
QUIK:
-$7.15M
AEHR:
-$10.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUIK vs. AEHR — Risk / Return Rank
QUIK
AEHR
QUIK vs. AEHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUIK | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 8.57 | -6.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 17.93 | -11.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUIK vs. AEHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUIK drawdown since its inception was -99.59%, roughly equal to the maximum AEHR drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUIK and AEHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUIK | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.59% | -97.98% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.87% | -43.90% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.85% | -87.16% | +10.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.85% | -87.37% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.28% | -87.37% | -5.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.58% | -31.39% | -66.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.63% | -79.35% | -12.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.51% | 20.94% | -3.43% |
Volatility
QUIK vs. AEHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) is 24.36%, while Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a volatility of 50.37%. This indicates that QUIK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUIK | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.36% | 50.37% | -26.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.72% | 99.99% | -33.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.51% | 125.91% | -41.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.40% | 102.69% | -33.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.17% | 95.34% | -17.17% |
Dividends
QUIK vs. AEHR - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUIK nor AEHR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QUIK vs. AEHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QuickLogic Corporation and Aehr Test Systems. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QUIK vs. AEHR - Profitability Comparison
QUIK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.84M and revenue of 5.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.
AEHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a gross profit of 8.02M and revenue of 18.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
QUIK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported an operating income of -2.11M and revenue of 5.05M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.7%.
AEHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported an operating income of -987.00K and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.2%.
QUIK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported a net income of -2.21M and revenue of 5.05M, resulting in a net margin of -43.7%.
AEHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a net income of 1.39M and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUIK and AEHR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEHR has higher volatility (50.37%) compared to QUIK (24.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUIK dropped -99.59% vs AEHR's -97.98%.
AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUIK and AEHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer