QUIK vs. MXL
QUIK (QuickLogic Corporation) and MXL (MaxLinear, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, QUIK returned 1.09%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for MXL. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QUIK vs. MXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUIK achieves a 143.59% return, which is significantly lower than MXL's 412.34% return. Over the past 10 years, QUIK has underperformed MXL with an annualized return of 1.09%, while MXL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.
QUIK
- 1D
- -6.45%
- 1M
- -32.87%
- 6M
- 101.38%
- YTD
- 143.59%
- 1Y
- 128.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 1.09%
MXL
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 384.80%
- YTD
- 412.34%
- 1Y
- 497.72%
- 3Y*
- 40.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.84%
QUIK vs. MXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUIK QuickLogic Corporation | 143.59% | -46.81% | -18.47% | 169.65% | 0.59% | 34.83% | -36.83% | -41.61% | -57.82% | 25.18% |
MXL MaxLinear, Inc. | 412.34% | -11.88% | -16.79% | -29.99% | -54.97% | 97.41% | 79.97% | 20.57% | -33.38% | 21.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUIK and MXL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2010 | 0.28 |
The correlation between QUIK and MXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QUIK:
$259.48M
MXL:
$8.00B
QUIK:
-$0.89
MXL:
-$1.51
QUIK:
16.90
MXL:
15.33
QUIK:
10.54
MXL:
15.62
QUIK:
$14.50M
MXL:
$508.90M
QUIK:
$3.00M
MXL:
$289.93M
QUIK:
-$7.15M
MXL:
-$70.54M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUIK vs. MXL — Risk / Return Rank
QUIK
MXL
QUIK vs. MXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) and MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUIK | MXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.59 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 15.23 | -11.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 42.15 | -33.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUIK vs. MXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUIK drawdown since its inception was -99.59%, which is greater than MXL's maximum drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUIK and MXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUIK | MXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.59% | -88.13% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.33% | -32.97% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.85% | -73.61% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.85% | -88.13% | +11.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.28% | -88.13% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.30% | -30.25% | -67.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.62% | -44.88% | -46.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.50% | 11.89% | +2.61% |
Volatility
QUIK vs. MXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) is 28.58%, while MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) has a volatility of 42.38%. This indicates that QUIK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUIK | MXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.58% | 42.38% | -13.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.71% | 91.24% | -25.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.17% | 114.99% | -31.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.07% | 79.04% | -9.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.03% | 66.89% | +11.14% |
Dividends
QUIK vs. MXL - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUIK nor MXL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QUIK vs. MXL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QuickLogic Corporation and MaxLinear, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QUIK vs. MXL - Profitability Comparison
QUIK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.84M and revenue of 5.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.
MXL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.88M and revenue of 137.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
QUIK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported an operating income of -2.11M and revenue of 5.05M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.7%.
MXL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.21M and revenue of 137.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.
QUIK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuickLogic Corporation reported a net income of -2.21M and revenue of 5.05M, resulting in a net margin of -43.7%.
MXL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a net income of -45.14M and revenue of 137.19M, resulting in a net margin of -32.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUIK and MXL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXL has higher volatility (42.38%) compared to QUIK (28.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUIK dropped -99.59% vs MXL's -88.13%.
MXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.37 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUIK and MXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer