QUAL vs. SIZE
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and SIZE (iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while SIZE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Low Size Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.29%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for SIZE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
QUAL vs. SIZE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QUAL having a 9.65% return and SIZE slightly higher at 9.93%. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed SIZE with an annualized return of 14.29%, while SIZE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.
QUAL
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
SIZE
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
QUAL vs. SIZE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 9.65% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 9.93% | 10.51% | 14.37% | 17.78% | -15.86% | 25.05% | 16.26% | 28.97% | -6.59% | 18.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and SIZE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2013 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QUAL and SIZE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUAL vs. SIZE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
SIZE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QUAL
SIZE
Financial Services
QUAL
SIZE
Communication Services
QUAL
SIZE
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
SIZE
Healthcare
QUAL
SIZE
Industrials
QUAL
SIZE
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
SIZE
Energy
QUAL
SIZE
Utilities
QUAL
SIZE
Real Estate
QUAL
SIZE
Basic Materials
QUAL
SIZE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. SIZE — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
SIZE
QUAL vs. SIZE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUAL | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.43 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.25 | 9.45 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUAL | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.52 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.48 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.64 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.69 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. SIZE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum SIZE drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and SIZE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -39.15% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -7.97% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -18.71% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -24.03% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -39.15% | +5.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -4.18% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.04% | -0.06% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. SIZE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 2.54%, while iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIZE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 3.13% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.06% | 9.56% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 12.72% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 17.39% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 18.69% | -0.60% |
QUAL vs. SIZE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QUAL and SIZE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUAL vs. SIZE - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SIZE's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 1.41% | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and SIZE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIZE has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to QUAL (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs SIZE's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.29% vs 11.83% for SIZE. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL and SIZE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SIZE has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.
QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SIZE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index.
QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and SIZE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer