PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 35.82% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 17.88%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.04% annualized return.


MTUM

1D
3.32%
1M
8.16%
YTD
35.82%
6M
33.08%
1Y
45.28%
3Y*
35.42%
5Y*
15.79%
10Y*
17.88%

IDMO

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
9.71%
6M
8.67%
1Y
24.80%
3Y*
26.44%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
13.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
35.82%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
9.71%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and IDMO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.54

The correlation between MTUM and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MTUM vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTUM
IDMO

Technology

50.2%
6.2%

Industrials

15.0%
21.3%

Energy

10.5%
1.7%

Communication Services

5.1%
2.1%

Financial Services

5.0%
43.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.5%

Healthcare

3.5%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
1.5%

Basic Materials

2.3%
10.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Utilities

0.6%
7.9%

Technology

MTUM
50.2%
IDMO
6.2%

Industrials

MTUM
15.0%
IDMO
21.3%

Energy

MTUM
10.5%
IDMO
1.7%

Communication Services

MTUM
5.1%
IDMO
2.1%

Financial Services

MTUM
5.0%
IDMO
43.2%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.7%
IDMO
2.5%

Healthcare

MTUM
3.5%
IDMO
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
2.9%
IDMO
1.5%

Basic Materials

MTUM
2.3%
IDMO
10.6%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.3%
IDMO
1.8%

Utilities

MTUM
0.6%
IDMO
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

2.02

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

8.15

+6.84

MTUM vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-39.38%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-12.31%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-12.65%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-27.07%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-31.34%

-2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-2.65%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-9.72%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.05%

-0.02%

Volatility

MTUM vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 7.77%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.20%

7.77%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.59%

16.41%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

18.15%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.20%

18.10%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

17.96%

+3.37%

MTUM vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTUM vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than IDMO's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.64%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.55%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and IDMO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to IDMO (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.88% vs 13.04% for IDMO. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.55% for MTUM.

MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.25% for IDMO.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer