PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QUAL vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QUAL vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.27%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for IWM. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

QUAL vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 14.27%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.

QUAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.80%
6M
8.86%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.27%

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUAL vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		8.80%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF		17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and IWM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2013

0.80

The correlation between QUAL and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

QUAL vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QUAL
IWM

Technology

36.5%
19.5%

Financial Services

11.5%
15.8%

Communication Services

11.1%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
15.8%

Industrials

8.2%
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.1%

Energy

4.0%
6.0%

Utilities

1.9%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
5.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.5%

Technology

QUAL
36.5%
IWM
19.5%

Financial Services

QUAL
11.5%
IWM
15.8%

Communication Services

QUAL
11.1%
IWM
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.3%
IWM
7.8%

Healthcare

QUAL
9.0%
IWM
15.8%

Industrials

QUAL
8.2%
IWM
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.9%
IWM
2.1%

Energy

QUAL
4.0%
IWM
6.0%

Utilities

QUAL
1.9%
IWM
3.0%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.8%
IWM
5.7%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.7%
IWM
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Often compared with QUAL:
QUAL vs. SPHQQUAL vs. SPYQUAL vs. MTUMQUAL vs. USMVQUAL vs. VOOQUAL vs. IVVQUAL vs. SCHD
Often compared with IWM:
IWM vs. SPYIWM vs. VTWOIWM vs. IJRIWM vs. AVUVIWM vs. IWNIWM vs. VOOIWM vs. IWO

Return for Risk

QUAL vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QUALIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.84
2.05

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.62
2.85

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.56

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.00

12.64

-1.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QUAL vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QUALIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.05

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.27

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.48

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.37

+0.44

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and IWM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QUALIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-59.05%

+24.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-11.03%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-27.50%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-31.91%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-41.13%

+7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.49%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-10.77%

+6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.10%

-1.12%

Volatility

QUAL vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 2.51%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QUALIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

5.75%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

13.53%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

19.20%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

22.52%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

23.04%

-4.94%

QUAL vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QUAL vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, which matches IWM's 0.88% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF		0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		0.88%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

QUAL and IWM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to QUAL (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.27% vs 10.93% for IWM. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

QUAL and IWM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.88%.

QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.19% for IWM.

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer