PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUAL vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 14.27%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 13.31% annualized return.


QUAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.80%
6M
8.86%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.27%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUAL vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
8.80%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and IAU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2013

0.01

The correlation between QUAL and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QUAL vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUAL
IAU

Technology

36.5%

-

Financial Services

11.5%

-

Communication Services

11.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Industrials

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.8%
100.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

QUAL
36.5%
IAU

-

Financial Services

QUAL
11.5%
IAU

-

Communication Services

QUAL
11.1%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.3%
IAU

-

Healthcare

QUAL
9.0%
IAU

-

Industrials

QUAL
8.2%
IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.9%
IAU

-

Energy

QUAL
4.0%
IAU

-

Utilities

QUAL
1.9%
IAU

-

Real Estate

QUAL
1.8%
IAU
100.0%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.7%
IAU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUALIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.24

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.69

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.00

4.19

+6.81

QUAL vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUALIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.23

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.03

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.62

+0.18

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-45.14%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-19.18%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-19.18%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-20.93%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-21.82%

-12.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-17.70%

+17.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-15.96%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

7.71%

-5.73%

Volatility

QUAL vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 2.51%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUALIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

5.50%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

23.02%

-13.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

26.42%

-14.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.95%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

15.90%

+2.20%

QUAL vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUAL vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.88%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUAL and IAU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to QUAL (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.27% vs 13.31% for IAU. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 13.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IAU is Gold. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.25% for IAU.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer