QTUM vs. QQQ
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 28.96%/yr vs 17.86%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
QTUM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 52.13% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 20.71% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 19.63%
- YTD
- 52.13%
- 6M
- 48.25%
- 1Y
- 92.25%
- 3Y*
- 52.13%
- 5Y*
- 28.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
QTUM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 52.13% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -15.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and QQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between QTUM and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTUM vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTUM
QQQ
Industrials
QTUM
QQQ
Communication Services
QTUM
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
QQQ
Healthcare
QTUM
QQQ
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
QQQ
Energy
QTUM
-
QQQ
Financial Services
QTUM
-
QQQ
Real Estate
QTUM
-
QQQ
Utilities
QTUM
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
QQQ
QTUM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.44 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.08 | 3.42 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.92 | 13.14 | +9.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | 2.57 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.80 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.41 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -82.97% | +44.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -11.96% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -22.77% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -35.12% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.74% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -32.78% | +24.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.11% | +0.93% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 4.51% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.32% | 12.10% | +8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.27% | 15.94% | +10.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 22.37% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.16% | 22.29% | +4.87% |
QTUM vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and QQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.96% vs 17.86% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.96% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.18% for QQQ.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer