QTUM vs. ESPO
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 24.56%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for ESPO. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
QTUM vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 29.28% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -9.09% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -11.92%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 1Y
- 55.03%
- 3Y*
- 39.51%
- 5Y*
- 24.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.62%
ESPO
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- -11.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.98M | $1.50M | $1.55M | |
| $54.21M | $61.13M | $111.15M |
QTUM vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 29.28% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -11.79% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -9.09% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and ESPO is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QTUM and ESPO has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QTUM vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
ESPO
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QTUM
ESPO
Industrials
QTUM
ESPO
-
Communication Services
QTUM
ESPO
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
ESPO
Healthcare
QTUM
ESPO
-
Financial Services
QTUM
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
ESPO
-
Energy
QTUM
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
QTUM
-
ESPO
-
Utilities
QTUM
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
ESPO
QTUM vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTUM | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.92 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | -0.39 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | -0.62 | +10.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -50.99% | +12.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.51% | -29.43% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -29.43% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -48.33% | +9.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.16% | -22.03% | +5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -15.23% | +6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.87% | 18.32% | -12.45% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 6.66%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 6.66% | +4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.47% | 16.07% | +10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.67% | 19.65% | +12.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.69% | 25.12% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.69% | 25.65% | +2.04% |
QTUM vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than ESPO's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.37% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.83% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and ESPO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to ESPO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 24.56% vs 8.32% for ESPO. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.83% for QTUM.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Gaming. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.55% for ESPO.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer