PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. ESPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTUM vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 29.28% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -9.09% return.


QTUM

1D
0.67%
1M
-11.92%
6M
22.33%
YTD
29.28%
1Y
55.03%
3Y*
39.51%
5Y*
24.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.62%

ESPO

1D
-3.16%
1M
3.18%
6M
-5.98%
YTD
-9.09%
1Y
-11.33%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.98M$1.50M$1.55M
$54.21M$61.13M$111.15M

QTUM vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
29.28%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-11.79%
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-9.09%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and ESPO is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between QTUM and ESPO has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QTUM vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTUM
ESPO

Technology

81.4%
8.1%

Industrials

8.9%

-

Communication Services

6.6%
77.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
14.2%

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QTUM
81.4%
ESPO
8.1%

Industrials

QTUM
8.9%
ESPO

-

Communication Services

QTUM
6.6%
ESPO
77.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QTUM
2.0%
ESPO
14.2%

Healthcare

QTUM
1.2%
ESPO

-

Financial Services

QTUM
0.0%
ESPO

-

Basic Materials

QTUM

-

ESPO

-

Consumer Defensive

QTUM

-

ESPO

-

Energy

QTUM

-

ESPO

-

Real Estate

QTUM

-

ESPO

-

Utilities

QTUM

-

ESPO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTUM vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTUMESPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.92

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

-0.39

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

-0.62

+10.03

QTUM vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and ESPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUMESPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-50.99%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.51%

-29.43%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

-29.43%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-48.33%

+9.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.16%

-22.03%

+5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-15.23%

+6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

18.32%

-12.45%

Volatility

QTUM vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 6.66%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUMESPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.38%

6.66%

+4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.47%

16.07%

+10.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.67%

19.65%

+12.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.69%

25.12%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.69%

25.65%

+2.04%

QTUM vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTUM vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than ESPO's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.37%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.83%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM and ESPO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to ESPO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 24.56% vs 8.32% for ESPO. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.83% for QTUM.

QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Gaming. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.55% for ESPO.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM and ESPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer