QTR vs. PLTR
QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 21.15%/yr vs 97.43%/yr for PLTR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QTR vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -39.65% return.
QTR
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 13.83%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 26.85%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- -5.49%
- 1M
- -21.47%
- YTD
- -39.65%
- 6M
- -44.75%
- 1Y
- -24.93%
- 3Y*
- 97.43%
- 5Y*
- 31.99%
- 10Y*
- —
QTR vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 13.83% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -39.65% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -25.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and PLTR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between QTR and PLTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
PLTR
QTR vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTR | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.95 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | -0.52 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | -1.11 | +8.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTR vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -84.62% | +52.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -48.22% | +35.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.99% | -48.22% | +29.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -48.22% | +44.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -40.27% | +31.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 22.45% | -18.77% |
Volatility
QTR vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 8.20%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 19.81%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.20% | 19.81% | -11.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 38.76% | -25.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 51.76% | -35.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 65.65% | -47.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 69.73% | -51.39% |
Dividends
QTR vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.49%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 16.49% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTR and PLTR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (19.81%) compared to QTR (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTR and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer