QTR vs. PFIX
QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) and PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while PFIX is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Simplify. QTR is passively managed, while PFIX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 22.93%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for PFIX. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. QTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PFIX.
Performance
QTR vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's -2.55% return.
QTR
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- -15.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- —
QTR vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 17.64% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | -2.55% | 0.42% | 35.94% | 5.67% | 92.05% | -6.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and PFIX is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | -0.09 |
The correlation between QTR and PFIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QTR vs. PFIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTR
PFIX
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QTR
PFIX
-
Communication Services
QTR
PFIX
-
Consumer Cyclical
QTR
PFIX
-
Consumer Defensive
QTR
PFIX
-
Healthcare
QTR
PFIX
-
Industrials
QTR
PFIX
-
Utilities
QTR
PFIX
-
Basic Materials
QTR
PFIX
-
Energy
QTR
PFIX
-
Financial Services
QTR
PFIX
Real Estate
QTR
PFIX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
PFIX
QTR vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTR | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.93 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | -0.61 | +3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | -0.96 | +10.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTR | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | -0.52 | +2.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.39 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and PFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -36.17% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -25.64% | +13.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.99% | -36.17% | +17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -19.65% | +19.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -17.13% | +8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 16.35% | -12.78% |
Volatility
QTR vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 4.52%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 7.51% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 20.89% | -10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 30.32% | -16.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 38.50% | -20.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 38.35% | -20.25% |
QTR vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTR vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.96%, more than PFIX's 9.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 9.96% | 9.92% | 3.40% | 87.92% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 15.96% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTR and PFIX have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIX has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to QTR (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs PFIX's -36.17%.
On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 22.93% vs 14.54% for PFIX. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QTR has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 9.96% for PFIX.
QTR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PFIX is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.50% for PFIX.
QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTR and PFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer