PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTR vs. ADME
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTR vs. ADME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTR vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
-7.25%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
-3.52%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%5.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a -7.25% return, which is significantly lower than ADME's -3.52% return.


QTR

1D
1.82%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-7.25%
6M
-6.08%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
10Y*

ADME

1D
2.21%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTR vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ADME's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTR vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTR vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTRADMEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.85

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.28

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.83

5.54

-0.70

QTR vs. ADME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the ADME Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTR and ADME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTRADMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.85

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between QTR and ADME is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QTR vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison

QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.24%, more than ADME's 0.42% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
20.24%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.42%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%

Drawdowns

QTR vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than ADME's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and ADME.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTRADMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-27.49%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-8.99%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.69%

-5.44%

-5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-8.05%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.19%

+1.26%

Volatility

QTR vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) at 4.03%. This indicates that QTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTRADMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.03%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

7.59%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

13.91%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

12.88%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

14.45%

+3.71%