PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTPI vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTPI achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


QTPI

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.05%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.87%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QTPI and ISCMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTPI vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTPI
QTPI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTPIISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

2.31

-1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

5.53

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

11.95

-1.26

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTPI and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTPI drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTPI and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTPIISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-25.42%

+21.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-5.69%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-5.26%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-13.36%

+12.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

2.63%

-2.11%

Volatility

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) is 1.34%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that QTPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTPIISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

5.11%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

15.45%

-12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

17.87%

-13.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

14.29%

-9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

14.29%

-9.33%

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTPI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTPI vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

QTPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QTPI and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to QTPI (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTPI dropped -4.08% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs 5.53% for QTPI. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QTPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.

QTPI has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

QTPI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: North Square and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTPI and 0.19% for ISCMF.

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTPI and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer