QTOP vs. XLE
QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTOP is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QTOP returned 45.99% vs 45.00% for XLE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTOP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
QTOP vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.
QTOP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 10.74%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 6M
- 21.95%
- 1Y
- 45.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
QTOP vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 22.71% | 22.19% | 5.80% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOP and XLE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.02 |
The correlation between QTOP and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QTOP vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTOP
XLE
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QTOP
XLE
-
Communication Services
QTOP
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
QTOP
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
QTOP
XLE
-
Healthcare
QTOP
XLE
-
Basic Materials
QTOP
XLE
-
Industrials
QTOP
XLE
-
Energy
QTOP
-
XLE
Financial Services
QTOP
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
QTOP
-
XLE
-
Utilities
QTOP
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTOP vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
QTOP
XLE
QTOP vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTOP | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.75 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.20 | 10.92 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTOP | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.21 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.31 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
QTOP vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOP | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -71.26% | +47.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -12.05% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -6.15% | +5.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -17.98% | +14.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 4.14% | -0.65% |
Volatility
QTOP vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is 5.23%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that QTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTOP | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 8.25% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 16.58% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 20.53% | -3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 26.02% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 29.59% | -6.89% |
QTOP vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QTOP vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTOP and XLE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to QTOP (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 1-year performance, QTOP leads with 45.99% vs 45.00% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QTOP has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTOP has performed better with a 45.99% return vs 45.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QTOP.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.32% for QTOP.
QTOP is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLE is Energy Equities. QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.08% for XLE.
QTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTOP and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer