QTOC vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QTOC (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - QTOC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while QTJL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTOC returned 18.31%/yr vs 19.09%/yr for QTJL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

QTOC vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOC achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.39% return.

QTOC

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 8.58%
• 1Y: 18.87%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.98%
• 1Y: 18.48%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOC vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October	9.53%	16.79%	14.90%	38.43%	-29.84%	7.47%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.39%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOC and QTJL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.92

The correlation between QTOC and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QTOC vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOC

QTOC Risk / Return Rank: 53
QTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
QTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 71
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOC vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTOC	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.88	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.69	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	2.78	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.51	14.63	-5.12

QTOC vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOC Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOC and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTOC vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOC drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, roughly equal to the maximum QTJL drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOC and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTOC	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.43%	-33.40%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-6.68%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.24%	-22.43%	+1.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-0.03%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.40%	-7.84%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.27%	+0.72%

Volatility

QTOC vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.60%. This indicates that QTOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTOC	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	0.60%	+2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.42%	7.39%	+3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	9.86%	+2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.69%	20.30%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.69%	20.30%	-0.61%

QTOC vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QTOC and QTJL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

QTOC vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTOC nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTOC and QTJL in my portfolio?

QTOC and QTJL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTOC or QTJL?

QTOC has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to QTJL (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOC dropped -33.43% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, QTOC or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 19.09% vs 18.31% for QTOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTOC or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 19.09% return vs 18.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTOC or QTJL?

QTOC and QTJL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTOC or QTJL?

QTOC and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTOC and QTJL?

QTOC is categorized as Options Trading, while QTJL is Leveraged Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.