QTOC vs. EOCT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT).

QTOC and EOCT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTOC is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 30, 2021. EOCT is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 30, 2021.

Performance

QTOC vs. EOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QTOC vs. EOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October	-3.06%	16.79%	14.90%	38.43%	-29.84%	6.99%
EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October	0.91%	22.03%	9.66%	6.26%	-10.75%	-0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOC achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than EOCT's 0.91% return.

QTOC

• 1D: 4.95%
• 1M: -2.72%
• YTD: -3.06%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 20.08%
• 3Y*: 15.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EOCT

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 19.93%
• 3Y*: 11.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOC vs. EOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EOCT's 0.89% expense ratio.

EOCT

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October

QTOC

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

Return for Risk

QTOC vs. EOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOC

QTOC Risk / Return Rank: 59
QTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 70

EOCT

EOCT Risk / Return Rank: 90
EOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOC vs. EOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTOC	EOCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.91	-1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.67	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.39	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	3.04	-1.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.38	12.67	-5.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTOC vs. EOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the EOCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOC and EOCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTOC	EOCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.91	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.49	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between QTOC and EOCT is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QTOC vs. EOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTOC nor EOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QTOC vs. EOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOC drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than EOCT's maximum drawdown of -20.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOC and EOCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTOC	EOCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.43%	-20.35%	-13.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.38%	-6.57%	-7.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.15%	-4.23%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-5.88%	-2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	1.58%	+1.14%

Volatility

QTOC vs. EOCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) at 4.79%. This indicates that QTOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTOC	EOCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.44%	4.79%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.34%	6.68%	+4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.67%	10.48%	+12.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.06%	11.41%	+8.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.06%	11.41%	+8.65%