QTOC vs. QTJA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTOC (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and QTJA (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTOC returned 19.15%/yr vs 18.10%/yr for QTJA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

QTOC vs. QTJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QTOC having a 10.79% return and QTJA slightly lower at 10.75%.

QTOC

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: 19.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJA

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 26.02%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOC vs. QTJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October	10.79%	16.79%	14.90%	38.43%	-30.34%
QTJA Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January	10.75%	18.86%	18.47%	25.56%	-34.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOC and QTJA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022	0.90

The correlation between QTOC and QTJA shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (3 years) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QTOC vs. QTJA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTOC	QTJA
Technology	54.2%	54.2%
Communication Services	15.5%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	7.6%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	2.8%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.2%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QTOC vs. QTJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOC

QTOC Risk / Return Rank: 58
QTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
QTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

QTJA

QTJA Risk / Return Rank: 74
QTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOC vs. QTJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTOC	QTJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.44	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.46	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.52	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.68	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	14.08	-2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTOC vs. QTJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOC Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the QTJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOC and QTJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTOC	QTJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.44	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.28	+0.21

Drawdowns

QTOC vs. QTJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOC drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, smaller than the maximum QTJA drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOC and QTJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTOC	QTJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.43%	-36.07%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-9.75%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.24%	-21.73%	+0.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.04%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-13.29%	+4.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.85%	+0.12%

Volatility

QTOC vs. QTJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) is 1.26%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that QTOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTOC	QTJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.57%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	9.42%	+0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.49%	10.72%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.77%	20.45%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.77%	20.45%	-0.68%

QTOC vs. QTJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QTOC and QTJA have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

QTOC vs. QTJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTOC nor QTJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTOC and QTJA in my portfolio?

QTOC and QTJA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTOC or QTJA?

QTJA has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to QTOC (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOC dropped -33.43% vs QTJA's -36.07%.

Which ETF is better, QTOC or QTJA?

On 3-year performance, QTOC leads with 19.15% vs 18.10% for QTJA. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QTOC has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTOC or QTJA?

Over the 3-year period, QTOC has performed better with a 19.15% return vs 18.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTOC or QTJA?

QTOC and QTJA have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTOC or QTJA?

QTOC and QTJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.