QTJA vs. QQQ
QTJA (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTJA is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. QTJA is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTJA returned 18.11%/yr vs 28.78%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTJA charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
QTJA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTJA achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
QTJA
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
QTJA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTJA Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January | 10.80% | 18.86% | 18.47% | 25.56% | -34.58% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTJA and QQQ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QTJA and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTJA vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTJA
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QTJA
QQQ
Communication Services
QTJA
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
QTJA
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
QTJA
QQQ
Healthcare
QTJA
QQQ
Industrials
QTJA
QQQ
Utilities
QTJA
QQQ
Basic Materials
QTJA
QQQ
Energy
QTJA
QQQ
Financial Services
QTJA
QQQ
Real Estate
QTJA
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTJA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QTJA
QQQ
QTJA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTJA | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.64 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 3.45 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.45 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.51 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.80 | 13.49 | +1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTJA | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.64 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.41 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
QTJA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTJA drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJA and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTJA | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -82.97% | +46.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -11.96% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -22.77% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -32.79% | +19.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 3.11% | -1.26% |
Volatility
QTJA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) is 1.58%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that QTJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTJA | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 4.49% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 12.10% | -2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.73% | 15.94% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 22.38% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 22.29% | -1.84% |
QTJA vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTJA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
QTJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
QTJA Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, QTJA and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to QTJA (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJA dropped -36.07% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.78% vs 18.11% for QTJA. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QTJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.78% return vs 18.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJA.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for QTJA.
QTJA is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJA and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTJA and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer